Fantastic stuff. Thank you. I know how incredibly hard you have worked. Gotta feel great it is all paying off.
The last thread of the net of lies is unraveling.
I have a few questions, particularly about the timing of the attribution release okay by the Obama administration (i.e., Obama) and what they had and what the FBI had and that meeting the same day with the White House.
Let me soak on it a while, reread, and see if I can pose the questions cogently.
Also, could you say these sentences in another way? I want to make sure you are saying what I think you are saying. (Oops-- I will cut and paste them below.)
Lastly-- will you please do one of those things where we can ask you questions sometime after Christmas? Soon, but enough time to go back over stuff and gather thoughts.
"There is no dispute that the alleged DNC hack was launched from technical infrastructure known to be associated with Russia. The issue is that anyone familiar enough with DNS can do the same thing emulating the tactics, techniques and procedures of a known malign group."
Would you please rephrase this, in terms a Luddite would understand?
What does "launched from technical infrastructure known to be associated with Russia" mean? Computers in Russia or some kind of program or location signature that isn't necessarily from Russia?
TOT - I appreciate both your comments. I also agree that Russiagate may be the biggest political scandal in US history--so I believe these reports and the work behind them are extremely important--for that reason the reports could really use a good editor because, like you, I find some of this stuff really hard to follow. A good chronological timeline tying the actions of the various players in this conspiracy together would be most useful.
Fantastic stuff. Thank you. I know how incredibly hard you have worked. Gotta feel great it is all paying off.
The last thread of the net of lies is unraveling.
I have a few questions, particularly about the timing of the attribution release okay by the Obama administration (i.e., Obama) and what they had and what the FBI had and that meeting the same day with the White House.
Let me soak on it a while, reread, and see if I can pose the questions cogently.
Also, could you say these sentences in another way? I want to make sure you are saying what I think you are saying. (Oops-- I will cut and paste them below.)
Lastly-- will you please do one of those things where we can ask you questions sometime after Christmas? Soon, but enough time to go back over stuff and gather thoughts.
Thanks for doing this. If state media ignores it, which they will, no one will ever know. Can you get on FOX? Do you have an agent?
"There is no dispute that the alleged DNC hack was launched from technical infrastructure known to be associated with Russia. The issue is that anyone familiar enough with DNS can do the same thing emulating the tactics, techniques and procedures of a known malign group."
Would you please rephrase this, in terms a Luddite would understand?
What does "launched from technical infrastructure known to be associated with Russia" mean? Computers in Russia or some kind of program or location signature that isn't necessarily from Russia?
TOT - I appreciate both your comments. I also agree that Russiagate may be the biggest political scandal in US history--so I believe these reports and the work behind them are extremely important--for that reason the reports could really use a good editor because, like you, I find some of this stuff really hard to follow. A good chronological timeline tying the actions of the various players in this conspiracy together would be most useful.