The Unwritten Chapter of Durham's Report
It will take a long time to come to terms with Durham’s report. Days ago I teased that either John Durham or I would give you the truth about Russiagate soon.
That didn’t happen today from John Durham.
There is more to the story, which is crucial to understanding what happened. We have seen glimpses of this in documents we have obtained.
In this letter from one of David Dagon’s attorneys, there is an unambiguous reference to work done on the hack of the Democratic National Committee.
In this email from Manos Antonakakis, there is another unambigious reference to working on the hack of the Democratic National Committee.
Now why would two persons associated with the Alfa Bank allegations also be associated with the DNC hack investigation in any manner? Why would they be providing materials to the DOJ/Mueller?
John Durham owed us clarity.
I have other pieces to the puzzle, but it shouldn’t come down to me. I wasn’t the guy hired to investigate this for 4 years. I don’t know if anyone will ask Durham about our documents if and when he goes to a Congressional hearing, and I don’t think he will answer it if someone does.
I’ll even say this, it’s incredibly unfair to Dagon, Antonakakis and others to leave these questions unanswered. Durham savaged these guys through multiple filings and then left way too much open. There’s shouldn’t be any open questions, and there shouldn’t be the need for any speculation.
If our government relied in any part on materials provided by the Alfa Bank researchers for DNC hack attribution, the theoretical prosecution of the 12 indicted GRU agents is dead in the water just based on Brady v Maryland and other pretrial disclosures.
There’s nothing in today’s report that justifies 4 years of our time.
Yeah, the GA Tech guys working on bogus Alfa Bank stuff and DNC hack attribution just screams for a thorough explanation.
And, as you noted, so does the entire DNC hack and the way it was handled (or rather, not handled).
Who is "Danchenko Employer-1"???
This person/entity evidently served as a conduit for Steele's money.
Fool Nelson seemed to imply that Danchenko was involved in the DNC hack, if I was reading that correctly bit from his recent comments on Durham cirrectly. Not sure I was understanding that comment or what that was about.
Interesting to think about what the source was for the Russians to have the information they did on Hillary's "swift boat" scheme. I don't recall reading anything in the Wikileaks emails that had specificity like they discussed. Makes me wonder if their source was human, e.g., Dolan, other email accounts they hacked, etc. The timing on the communication that the CIA, or whomever, intercepted seems to indicate it may not have been from the DNC hacks, malware, etc. A Russian agent inside the DNC or friends with someone like Dolan seems like one possibility.
Thoughts? Thanks!
The Durham disappointment is deep! As you pointed out, and we've all seen, Durham used two lame trials to feed information into discovery; but to what end??
The end was always the beginning: create chaos to cover-up the Hillary Clinton e-mail scandal. The same Hillary who used a private, unsecure e-mail server to conduct the Diplomacy of the U.S. as Secretary of State and with the knowledge and permission of President Obama, who himself kept a personal Blackberry. Hillary Clinton was responsible for Benghazi and destroyed all of the evidence. Hillary Clinto is responsible for Russia Collusion lie and President Obama, VP Biden, and all the top Obama spooks knew Trump was being set-up. And he continues to be set-up because the RUSSIA HOAX is not the story that needs telling.
Obama, Biden, Clinton and the FBI/CIA, DOJ, etc...selling out America...that's the story.