There is a lot on the line tomorrow, and my expectations are low.
I expect none of the questions we raised (1) (2) or that Techno Fog raised (3) will be asked tomorrow of Durham.
There is some type of agreement where Durham will not be asked and will not answer anything outside his report. That would put a torch to our most important questions on the DNC hack and attribution.
So unless someone has some integrity and has been putting in the work to know what to ask, tomorrow’s hearing will be worthless. Durham’s report is worthless. And I wish I had some good news.
I am right on some things. I know some things to be true.
Indications are that the attribution for the hack of the Democratic National Committee was significantly influenced by many of the same cyber researchers connected to the Alfa Bank hoax.
Durham didn’t cover it in his report, so he can’t be asked about it.
I know I will be able to obtain a significant amount of additional evidence that further supports the documentary evidence we have already obtained. In addition, my sources are high level contacts in the government and they tell me that I am right - there is a bombshell or two on the attribution.
If anything, Durham created tremendous value in the work that my friends and I have been doing, because nobody else in the entire world is looking or asking any questions. We are the only ones.
The geopolitical impications of a false flag hacking operation to kick off a false Trump-Russia narrative are vast. Everything about the United States is on the line. Twelve Russians remain under federal indictment. They may be guilty of some hacks, but I don’t think they hacked the DNC.
It doesn’t make sense, because there really wasn’t any type of Russian influence campaign now that the layers have been peeled back. Democrat operatives created more fake Russian twitter bot accounts than the Russians did (see Project Birmingham/Hamilton-68).
It makes much more sense that Clinton initiated everything. The “hack” bolstered the prominence of the Steele dossier and other trash they were going to peddle. Now we know they fabricated evidence, ask yourself, why would they make authentic malign Russian activites appear worse, both before and after the election?
As far as I am concerned, we have put plenty of material into the public sphere. It should all be fair game. He should be asked about the roles of Manos Antonakakis and David Dagon and others. Make me into the nutjob conspiracy theorist. I don’t care - just ask our questions. Let me see Durham roll his eyes and say that I am just an internet lunatic spouting nonsense. Make him tell us about what steps he did to debunk it all.
It was only 9 months ago that we finally learned Igor Danchenko had been a paid CHS for years, and there are bigger bombshells to come.
This is where this bleeds over to something more personal. I am sick to death of people in Congress and the media not giving a shit. I know the people I have been working with, I know we are right and I know people in this country deserve to know what we know and they should hear it from John Durham tomorrow.
This shouldn’t be on some blogger’s corner of the internet. And this is not a story to couch as “FBI abuses”. That is not the hook of this story. There is something much bigger here.
If Durham refuses to answer, it should be an automatic subpoena to compel testimony on subjects clearly within his knowledge.
I don’t care what technological information has to be revealed, or what sources and methods might be compromised. His report was supposed to the end. It wasn’t supposed to come down to me and my friends to put out things John Durham refused to.
We have put enough material out there, there are ample public records to cite, and it is time.