The Danchenko case went to the jury around 1pm today, and deliberations have ended for the day with no verdict.
The Durham team had an excellent closing argument pointing out the implausibility of Danchenko’s communications with some clean logic. Here is one series of the closing:
3 weeks after initial email to Milian, Danchenko wrote to him again 8/18/2016. He said: "I wrote to you several weeks ago. We are contacts on LinkedIn.
If there’s opportunity & interest, let’s meet and chat about another project.
Write, call. My contact information is below."
On August 24, 2016, Danchenko emails Zlodorev that, "For some reason, Sergei doesn’t respond. What is your relationship with him like? I could call or write on LinkedIn but until he responds, I don’t want to pester him." (G.E. 115T)
What the email didn’t say:
• "I received a call last month from someone I thought might be Milian, would you know anything about this?"
• "We were supposed to meet in New York but he never showed up."
And so we will have to wait until tomorrow.
It’s a very tough case for Durham, but perhaps there is a glimmer of hope.
P.S. - For those interested in our monthly fundraising update for FOIA litigation, I have written that up here.
Hang in there. It took us 60+ years to get here, it won’t get fixed overnite. I’m hoping Durham is gathering data & laying low until midterms w/other charges.
Saw you went private on twitter. Hope everything is ok.